As Dems Work For Victory, Wellstone Action Puts Progressives In Motion
Wellstone Action! has successfully provided training for winning progressive candidates at the flagship Camp Wellstone workshops around the country; at least 80 Camp Wellstone alums ran for public office in Minnesota during the 2006 cycle. From Secretary of State Mark Ritchie to U.S. Rep. Tim Walz (DFL-MN1), to more than half the freshman DFL ranks of the state Legislature (including Marsha Swails (DFL-Woodbury), Kim Norton (DFL-Rochester), Robin Brown (DFL-Austin), David Bly (DFL-Northfield), Sandy Wollschlager (DFL-Cannon Falls)), Wellstone Action! candidate training surely helped these Dems pull off victories in districts well-known for leaning Republican. (Of the 80, 36 won office from school boards on up). The majority of trained candidates run for state legislatures.
With more than 20,000 trained so far, their programs for progressives run the whole gamut, from candidates to campaign workers to citizen activists, in particular working with students, labor groups, low-income communities, and Native American leaders. Nationwide training for congressional candidates appears to be working as well, or at least creating competitive races: one prominent example is Darcy Burner (darcyburner.com) in Washington's Eighth Congressional District (check out the 60-second intro), a local business owner who, like many trainees, was relatively new to politics. Reflecting Paul Wellstone's approach, the program attracts people who aren't typical insider party types, giving them more skill and direction. Trainings are non-partisan; people from all parties including Greens and Independents have participated, even the occasional Republican with a progressive bent.
Wellstone Action! doesn't officially support the many candidates they've helped train - more than 300 are running in this cycle - but they keep in touch and also work with Progressive Majority, which is directed more towards getting progressives to win during the election cycle. Another major electoral partner is the Energy Action Coalition's Power Vote, which organizes students for a clean energy economy, green jobs and securing the climate; Power Vote hopes to get 1 million votes for addressing climate change and green jobs.
After the election, it will be time to pivot to policy work. Communications director/senior trainer Elana Wolowitz told PIM that 2009 will be a "huge year" for progressives; even if someone more receptive is in the White House, lots of people will need training to start moving progressive politics into policy. It's no time for complacency, progressives feel, because otherwise the usual lobbyists will still end up guiding the debate. As part of U.S. Sen. Barack Obama's (D-IL) background, community organizing has been brought to the fore this cycle; major policy areas including green collar jobs and universal health care will become top issues.
After five years in action, they'll continue to adapt to the changing political landscape. The group won't focus narrowly on particular issues, but rather work with partner organizations to see what areas dovetail with their needs. Wolowitz says that refining training programs, switching from the election cycle over to civil engagement will really help build a "critical mass" of organizing. During the Republican National Convention, GOP vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin's jabs about community organizing "galvanized a lot of community organizers" across the political spectrum, she says.
Here's a map of alumni running this year. With over 300 graduates running for office across the country, they're excited to see how many alums find their way into serving in government on Election Day.

Photo source: Wellstone Action!
After The Crash, Aftershocks And Parity For Mental Health
Doug Grow's column today in MinnPost reviews the supercharged, incomparable Wellstone memorial at Williams Arena. Former St. Paul mayor George Latimer reflects on whether he should have interrupted Rick Kahn's abruptly electoral speech, which conservatives united around and seized upon, likely giving U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman (R-MN) the stylistic edge he needed to slip into victory. This PIM writer recalls the raw emotions sloshing around the Arena, as many in the audience first booed former U.S. Sen. Trent Lott, then laughed about booing him (This writer could see from the simulcast in the adjacent volleyball arena that Lott grinned and seemed to take it all in relative good humor).
Latimer tells Grow, "Should I tackle him? Pull the plug? I never would have dreamed of cutting off Paul's sons. But I did think of cutting him (Kahn) off. But I don't regret not doing that. Any impulse I had to stop him, I held back because you could see this was a kid in total grief and you had to have respect for that... What I did was feeble." And thus did passing judgment on such a uniquely loaded event worked out for the GOP -- who've never had to host such a difficult observance.
Finally, it brought things full circle when U.S. Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-MN3), in one of his final Beltway efforts, spearheaded getting the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 into the financial bailout package, championed also by Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-RI1) and Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) and Pete Domenici (R-NM). This bill ensures that insurance plans can't put arbitrary and discriminatory restrictions on mental health and addiction coverage, as millions of American families suffer from chemical dependency and mental illnesses.


Are the CD3 Progressives also Democrats?
Hi, what's going on in CD3? Go to the CD3 dfl website and you'll see "Tonka Progressives" "Progressives on the Prairie" "Bloomington Progressives"... The Progressive party was/ is a registered party in Minnesota. As far as I know, the last to run for President as a Progressive was no other than Eugene McCarthy in 1988.
I hope those CD3 progressive groups intend to work within and enhance the DFL. Votes for third party candidates often end up helping to elect the candidate least liked by the third party voter.
I think we need to have a consistently used definition for "Progressive." Besides the possibility of Progressives splitting off from the DFL, I'm also worried about people thinking progressive means "further to the left than liberal" or "socialist". Ambiguity can lead to smear tactics... just look to Rochester and Wojcik's race for city council to see what I mean.
For Republicans Sandy Wollschlager's race might have been the bellwhether, but for Dems we might look to Wojcik's race to see what is coming.
I've started a blog called progressivenature dot com if you'd like to help define "progressive." I think we can do this so it appeals to the middle and still captures the nature of progressivism. You don't need a password and user ID to post comments, but please see the guidelines page first.
Wellstone, and what does it mean to be progressive?
Fun to see Paul and Sheila on the bus. I live in Northfield and that bus used to sit on main street sometimes, perhaps to be fixed.
I still get nervous when I see Sheila. She was our high school librarian and I used the back door to "escape" into the halls (yes, skip out of class, oops). Sheila didn't miss a thing and boy was I sorry. No library for two weeks, even though my class was doing a major project. She was a tough cookie.
After years of thinking, I believe Paul appealed to the masses by using humor, humilty, and common sense. He got away with using the label "liberal." He appealed to the middle, while quietly doing what is best for the little guy. Do you agree? Or am I way off, here? He defined liberal in his own terms, and then moved on to make waves... What does it mean to be progressive, now, BTW?
I worry about Paul's sons. What's that Mark up to? What a fireball of energy he was. The world needs those kinds of people to move mountains.
Ten Compelling Reasons to Vote John McCain
TEN COMPELLING REASONS TO VOTE MCCAIN
1. CHECK ON LIBERAL CONGRESS. The only way the liberal Congress will be checked at all is if McCain gets elected. Otherwise Pelosi, Dodd, and Frank(the very same people who contributed greatly to the current crisis through resisting reforms to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and pushing “affordable housing” to those who weren’t credit worthy) will have unchecked freedom to cause further economic havoc and impose irresponsible, unaffordable spending programs on this country(we’ve had a Democratic Congress for the last two years and frankly they’ve done a terrible job—-the last thing we need to do is to give them unchecked power)
2. OBAMA TAX POLICIES WILL TURN CRISIS INTO CATASTROPHE Obama, despite his promises, will turn a crisis into a catastrophe if his economic policies are implemented. This will not help the average “Joe”. Raising taxes in a weak economy is the worst possible economic policy one can do. In 1932, for example,(in an effort eerily similar to the rationale Obama is using) Congress raised taxes on the wealthy and the result was an 8 point jump in unemployment. Moreover, taking money from the pool of funds job creators have means less money to pay wages, less money to pay health care and other benefits, and less jobs. What good is a $500.00 government check if the tax punishment meted out by Obama on your boss forces your boss to cut salaries, health care benefits, raise prices on consumers or, in the worst case scenario, close the business?
3. REAL OBAMA VIEWS MIDDLE CLASS AS “BITTER CLINGERS” AND OBAMA’S JOE THE PLUMBER ENCOUNTER SHOWS HIS TRUE DISDAIN FOR THE MIDDLE CLASS We’ve seen evidence of what Obama really thinks about the average “Joe” and it isn’t encouraging or pretty. Remember Obama’s remarks that Pennsylvanians were “bitter clingers to guns and religion”. These remarks were made when Obama wasn’t expecting them to be recopied(they thus represent the real Obama). And why should we be surprised at this elitist worldview given the fact Obama is a Ivy League lawyer who spent 20 years in the hate filled church of Jeremiah Wright? Further, look at Obama’s appalling treatment of “Joe” the Plumber. “Joe” is an average guy who wants to buy a business but his dreams can not happen under the Obama tax plan because Obama takes away any incentive to gross more than $250,000.00 in income. And both Obama and Biden essentially mocked “Joe the Plumber” once they learned he was probably a McCain supporter. They and the media made sure(within a days time) that this average “Joe” would have numerous embarrassing details about his life exposed worldwide in an effort to discredit him. And why, all because(when Obama came to his house—he didn’t seek out Obama—Obama sought him out) he dared to ask a reasonable straightforward question that any private citizen should be able to ask their President? Vote for other Democrats if you like(except Murtha who in my view shares the same elitist worldview as demonstrated by his comments Pennsylvanians are “racists” and “rednecks”) but we don’t need more elitists like Obama in leadership positions.
4. DEMS LIKE OBAMA LARGELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CURRENT CRISIS. Obama, Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, and Barney Frank, have pushed for the “affordable housing” policies that have encouraged or pressured banks into making loans to poor minorities and whites who weren’t credit worthy. Obama and Dodd were the top two recipients of Fannie Mae campaign contributions. Obama also picked Jim Johnson(former Fannie Mae executive) to lead his vice presidential team. According to the Washington Post, one of Obama’s economic advisers is Franklin Raines(another Fannie Mae executive who in Raines’ case raked in 90 million dollars from Fannie Mae). Obama represented ACORN, trained ACORN workers, he and Ayers gave $200,000 to ACORN, Obama’s campaign gave $800,000.00 to ACORN, and ACORN intimidated many banks into giving bad loans to minorities with discrimination lawsuits. John McCain, in contrast, called for reforms of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Frank, and Dodd, resisted those reforms. Bush called for numerous reforms of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the Democrats also opposed these reforms. So why in the world, given the fact the Democrats largely caused this crisis, would we want to put Obama, Dodd, Reid, Pelosi, and Frank in total unchecked command of the country?
5. HEALTH CARE PLAN DISASTROUS On health care, Obama’s plan is unaffordable and will lead to a total collapse of the system ultimately. Obama wants a single payer system(he doesn’t say that now outwardly but that’s what he wants—-in 2003 in a speech before the AFL-CIO he said he favored a single payer system—-further his plan will ultimately lead to single payer because private insurers will be crowded out of the market—-they will be subject to costly new mandates and won’t be able to compete with Obama’s government subsidized plan) And single payer is an abject disaster and the the worst possible choice for health care. Why? For one thing, if you have single payer, you never get rid of it and you have no other option if you don’t like the way the single payer treats you. Further, in single payer countries like Canada, you have enormous wait lines(many Canadians flock to the US for care because of these wait lines), health care gets rationed(the government covers less because they have to in order to cut costs), and quality doctors leave the system(because they are paid low wages under single payer systems or less than they could make elsewhere). So Obama’s health care plan will not only not help the average “Joe”, his single payer dream will only lead to further hardship for the average “Joe” and a collapse of the system.
6. OBAMA ENERGY PLAN LEADS TO GREATER, NOT LESS DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL On energy, Obama’s energy policies will do next to nothing to help this country achieve “energy indepedence”. The last time a “windfall profits tax” was imposed(under Carter) our dependence on foreign oil grew and this happened because the windfall profits tax kills innovation on the part of oil companies(why should they drill more if they can’t make any profits from more drilling because Obama will take the money away) Moreover, Obama and the Democrats have historically railed against more drilling(Obama even scoffed we could save more energy by inflating our tires than we could gain from drilling for more oil) and nuclear power(two energy sources which are critical to helping us lessen dependence on foreign oil) so McCain and Palin are much more reliable in terms of drilling for more oil and building more nuclear power plants. Biden also said he and Obama wouldn’t build any “clean coal” plants. You should also note Obama wants to keep gas prices high(in fact he said he wasn’t upset about the fact gas prices rose, only that they rose too fast). Keeping gas prices high certainly doesn’t help the average “Joe”. And Obama also favors keeping gas taxes high while McCain has favored suspending the gas tax in the summer. The gas tax clearly hurts the average “Joe” because everyone has to buy gas(regardless of income level) yet it is McCain, not Obama, who is willing to give the average “Joe” the tax relief.
7. OBAMA FISCALLY IRRESPONSIBLE There is also no reason to believe Obama will be more fiscally responsible than McCain. McCain has proposed a spending freeze while Obama propses a trillion dollars in new spending. The resulting debt burden created by these spending programs will place an incredible burden and yoke on future generations. McCain is much more likely to keep spending in check.
8. MCCAIN MORE EXPERIENCED. OBAMA’S FOREIGN POLICY DISASTROUS In terms of foreign affairs, McCain has 26 years experience, Obama has 2. And Biden’s experience shows he has made the wrong judgment numerous times so he can’t be counted on to offer much help to Obama(after 9/11 Biden proposed giving $200 million to Iran—-a ridiculous idea, Biden also proposed partitioning Iraq—an idea Iraqis almost unanimously rejected, Biden and Obama opposed the surge while McCain’s judgment was vindicated on the surge). In terms of an unsteady hand, Obama has certainly shown an unsteady hand with his foreign policy gaffes already(e.g. wrong on the surge, 3 different answers on the Georgia situation, talking with dictators “without preconditions”, invading Pakistan). And, more recently, Biden said Obama would experience an international crisis if elected because he’s so inexperienced and that “America hang with us because our response won’t seem to be the right one”. There’s no evidence therefore Obama is capable of handling foreign policy crises better than McCain.
9. PALIN MOST EXPERIENCED ON ENERGY ISSUES, PALIN AT LEAST AS EXPERIENCED AS OBAMA In terms of Palin, Palin has at least as much experience than Obama. And on the critical energy issues, it is Palin who arguably has the most experience and knowledge of ALL the candidates on energy issues(because Palin was an oil and gas regulator, her husband has worked in the oil business, Palin negotiated the natural gas pipeline deal in Alaska, and Palin has lectured and given speeches on energy issues). Palin also hasn’t been given a fair shake by the media so if you’re relying on CNN, ABC, CBS, MSNBC, or the New York Times for your information on Palin, you are not, in my view, getting a fair picture of her. You should know that in the ABC interview Palin had, portions of it were edited out and were not shown to the public(these edited out portions would have made her answers appear more complete).
10. OBAMA’S ALLIANCES WITH RADICALS RAISE CRITICAL DOUBTS ABOUT HIS JUDGMENT AND SHOW HE HAS A RADICAL SOCIALIST WORLDVIEW. And I haven’t even discussed Obama’s numerous alliances with radicals, party hacks or corrupt individuals such as
a) Reverend Wright
b) Bill Ayers
c) Tony Rezko
d) Rashid Khalidi
e) Khalid al Monsour
f) Stroger
g) Richard Daley
h) Father Pfleger
Ten compelling reasons to vote McCain over Obama.
Ten Compelling Reasons to vote Obama
These are my observations, and I believe I'm on target. Ten reasons to vote for Obama:
1. Obama's a good man and has strong family values.
2. Obama's for regulating the market. Democrats have been arguing for more regulation to protect the middle class since time began. What have Repubicans been arguing for? Against regulation. We need to protect the middle class, so we can all be prosperous.
3. Obama is an honest man, and Obama is NOT one of the Keating 5. McCain IS a member of the Keating 5. These men were responsible for a recent, national, political scandal which was part of the larger Savings and Loan crisis of the late 1980s and early 1990s. McCain carries a lot of baggage, one of them being he was criticized by the courts for using bad judgement. Being a part of this scandal is not becoming.
4. Obama will bring us back to being fiscally responsible, and then our prosperity will grow. The last time our national budget wasn't a huge deficit? A Democrat was at the helm. Bill Clinton. Although, Obama and Bill aren't the same kind of person-- I believe Obama is truly honest, hard working, and not "slick." He's savvy, but not "slick."
5. Obama will represent us well in the world, and will bring us back to being a strong, respected, world leader. I believe he'd like us to use force if we absolutely need it (and there are good times to use force), but otherwise rely on diplomatic means to negociate with the world.
6. Obama will encourage the use of alternative energy, and help us to move away from our reliance on oil. Not just foreign oil, but all oil.
7. Our current health care system is a disaster. Costs are astronomical. I'm glad Obama is looking for ways to improve our system. After all, where would this country be if we didn't question bad systems? Out with the King, we said. Why do we have to keep what is broken? We don't. Vote Obama.
8. Obama listens to Americans, and will work on solutions for helping hard working American families. Time and time again I've heard him say "Folks are telling me..." and I know he's working on an action plan that will deny greed, but still encourage growth.
9. Obama has solid values and is bold, hard working, and smart.
10. Obama is competent, and his back-up (Biden) is, too. Obama may have taken financing from companies we now wish were regulated, but McCain took money AND tried to pass a bill to regulate these companies. The regulation bill didn't pass, and there was no regulation. But McCain still took the money... we need someone who will get things done, instead of point out how it can go better. Right?
Vote Obama!
I appreciate your civility
Fair Enough. I guess we're even.
Whoever wins, let's hope they can solve this nation's problems and will exercise common sense.